By Wayne Visser
Part 10 of 13 in Wayne Visser's Age of Responsibility Blog Series for 3BL Media.
One of the ways the business case is determined is that each
region, country or community has a different combination of CSR drivers. I will
start with the five typical CSR drivers that are local (or internal) drivers,
namely pressures from within the country or community.
1. Cultural tradition
In many countries and regions, CSR draws strongly on
deep-rooted indigenous cultural traditions of philanthropy, business ethics and
community embeddedness. For example, in a survey of over 1,300 small and
medium-sized enterprises in Latin America, Antonio Vives found that the
region’s religious beliefs are one of the major motivations for CSR. In Asia, a
study by scholars Wendy Chapple and Jeremy Moon reached a similar conclusion,
namely that ‘CSR does vary considerably among Asian countries but that this
variation is not explained by [levels of] development but by factors in the
respective national business systems’. And in Africa, I have found that the
values-based traditional philosophy of African humanism (ubuntu) is what
underpins much of the modern, inclusive approaches to CSR on the continent.
2. Political reform
CSR cannot be divorced from socio-political reform
processes, which often drive business behaviour towards integrating social and
ethical issues. For example, the political and associated social and economic
changes in Latin America since the 1980s, including democratization,
liberalization, and privatization, have shifted the role of business towards
taking greater responsibility for social and environmental issues. Likewise,
more recently, the goal of accession to EU membership has acted as an incentive
for many Central and Eastern European countries to focus on CSR, since the
latter is acknowledged to represent good practice in the EU.
3. Socio-economic priorities
CSR is typically shaped by local socio-economic priorities.
For instance, while poverty alleviation, health-care provision, infrastructure
development and education may be high on many developing country agendas, this
stands in stark contrast to many Western CSR priorities such as consumer
protection, fair trade, green marketing, climate change concerns, or socially
responsible investments. Stephen Schmidheiny questions the appropriateness of
imported CSR approaches, citing examples from Latin America where pressing
issues like poverty and tax avoidance are central to CSR, but often remain left
off of international CSR agendas.
4. Governance gaps
CSR is frequently seen as a way to plug the ‘governance
gaps’ left by weak, corrupt, or under-resourced governments that fail to
adequately provide various social services (housing, roads, electricity, health
care, education, etc.). Academics Dirk Matten and Jeremy Moon see this as part
of a wider trend in developing countries with weak institutions and poor
governance, in which responsibility is often delegated to private actors, be
they family, tribe, religion, or increasingly, business. A survey by WBCSD
illustrates this: when asked how CSR should be defined, Ghanaians stressed
‘building local capacity’ and ‘filling in when government falls short’.
5. Crisis response
Crises often have the effect of catalyzing CSR responses,
albeit mostly of the philanthropic kind. For example, the economic crisis in
Argentina in 2001 marked a significant turning point in CSR, prompting debates
about the role of business in poverty alleviation. Similarly, Hurricane Katrina
in the USA and HIV/AIDS in South Africa had the effect of galvanizing CSR. The
examples are endless, be they the industrial accidents of the 1970s and 1980s
(Seveso, Bhopal, Exxon Valdez), the environmental and human rights fiascos of
the 1990s (Shell, Nike, McDonald’s) or the corporate governance and natural
disasters of the 2000s (Enron, Katrina, Sichuan).
The rest of the CSR drivers are more global (or external)
and tend to have an international origin.
6. Market Access
The flipside of the socio-economic priorities driver is to
see these unfulfilled human needs as an untapped market. This notion underlies
the now burgeoning field of ‘bottom of the pyramid’ (BOP) strategies already
discussed. CSR may also be seen as an enabler for companies in developing
countries trying to access markets in the developed world. For example, a
survey of CSR reporting among the top 250 companies in Latin America found that
businesses with an international sales orientation were almost five times more
likely to report than companies that sold products regionally or locally.
7. International Standardisation
Codes are frequently a CSR response, especially in sectors
where social and environmental issues are deemed critical, such as textiles,
agriculture or mining. Often, CSR is driven by standardisation imposed by
multinationals striving to achieve global consistency among its subsidiaries
and operations in developing countries. For example, a study by Wendy Chapple
and Jeremy Moon in Asia found that ‘multinational companies are more likely to
adopt CSR than those operating solely in their home country, but that the
profile of their CSR tends to reflect the profile of the country of operation
rather than the country of origin’.
8. Investment Incentives
The belief that multinational investment is inextricably
linked with the social welfare of developing countries is not a new phenomenon.
However, increasingly these investments are being screened for CSR performance.
Hence, socially responsible investment (SRI) is becoming another driver for CSR
in many countries. Often, this is as a result of global SRI funds and indexes,
like the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and FTSE4Good, but the influence of
regional and national SRI instruments is also on the rise, with Brazil and
South Africa among the first to go glocal in this respect. In addition, there
are sector-based indexes emerging, like the ICT Sustainability Index launched
in 2008.
9. Stakeholder activism
In the absence of strong governmental controls over the
social, ethical and environmental performance of companies in some countries,
activism by stakeholder groups has become another critical driver for CSR. In
developing countries, four stakeholder groups emerge as the most powerful
activists for CSR, namely development agencies, trade unions, international
NGOs and business associations. These four groups provide a platform of support
for local NGOs, which are not always well developed or adequately resourced to
provide strong advocacy for CSR. The media is also emerging as a key
stakeholder for promoting CSR.
10. Supply chain integrity
Another significant driver for CSR, especially among small
and medium-sized companies, is the requirements that are being imposed by
multinationals on their supply chains. This trend began with various ethical
trading initiatives, which led to the growth of fair trade auditing and
labelling schemes for agricultural products. Later, poor labour conditions and
human rights abuses resulted in the development of certifiable standards like
SA 8000. Major change has also been achieved through sector-based initiatives
such as the Forest Stewardship Council and more recently, through the ‘Wal-Mart
effect’, involving choice editing to source only from sustainable and
responsible suppliers.
To conclude, the art of finding a ‘glocal’ business case is
to determine which of these 10 incentives and pressures are the strongest and
most applicable to the local context.
Article reference
Visser, W. (2012) What Drives the Business Case for CSR? Wayne
Visser Blog Briefing, 10 April 2012.
Source
Extracted and adapted from Visser, W. (2011) The Age of
Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business. London: Wiley.
***
Part of the WAYNE VISSER BLOG BRIEFING Series
Copyright 2012 Wayne Visser
No comments:
Post a Comment